For topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Reward Name :
Reward Description:
Prize:
Closing Date:
Status:

Payout Rules:
The total reward is divided among all statements that were created during the period after the reward is offered and are established at the payout date.
The total reward is divided among all save events occurring during the period after the reward is offered that add one or more statements that change the status of the root and are established at the payout date.
Half of the reward is divided among all statements that were created during the period after the reward is offered and are established at the payout date and the other half is divided among all save events occurring during the period after the reward is offered that add one or more statements that change the status of the root and are established at the payout date.


Topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Rewrd Name :
Reward Description:
Offered By:
Prize:
Closing Date:
Status:

Payout Rules:


Conditions:


Topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Test string

TOPIC HISTORY

Probability US blew up Nordstream pipeline


Statements

Statement Type Title Description Proposed Probability Author History Last Updated
STATEMENT Sweden confirms Nord Stream pipeline sabotage: prosecutor

Sweden confirms Nord Stream pipeline sabotage: prosecutor

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-11-19 15:43:04.0
TEST @trussliz used her iPhone to send a message to @SecBlinken saying ?It?s done? a minute after the pipeline blew up and before anybody else knew

@trussliz used her iPhone to send a message to @SecBlinken saying “It’s done” a minute after the pipeline blew up and before anybody else knew

I estimate .8 this happened  based on news reports

 I figure likelihood she would do that if they had blown it at .5,

Probability she would txt that then otherwise as . 01

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-10-31 16:34:54.0
STATEMENT The US deliberately blew up the Nordstrom pipeline

The US deliberately blew up the Nordstrom pipeline, or one of their allies did, at their behest. 

 

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-10-31 16:23:12.0
TEST They tried it before, in 2015


Gazprom just released these photos of a NATO Seafox drone that was found right next to Nord Stream 1 in 2015. The drone failed to detonate. NATO was caught red-handed and claimed the drone was lost during exercises. They tried it before. Go figure.

 

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-10-11 17:35:34.0
STATEMENT US has a motive. nobody else does.

The US views the sabotage of the Nord Stream gas pipelines as a “tremendous opportunity” to wean EU states off Russian energy, Secretary of State Antony Blinken told reporters on Friday.

Why would Russia blow up their own multibillion-dollar gas pipelines the day before a Danish gas pipeline openned, when Europe was about to be forced to make peace with them to restore energy supplies  with winter approaching and their economies collapsing?

 US needed to do it if they wanted to continue the war with Russia because otherwise Europe would make a separate peace

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-10-04 23:57:06.0
TEST The CIA has previously destroyed a Russian gas pipeline

The CIA has previously destroyed a Russian gas pipeline

I estimate its place twice as likely they would do it again if they'd done it before, as if they'd never done it before. 

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-10-04 23:45:38.0
STATEMENT US vowed to do so repeatedly

State Dept vows Nord Stream 2 will be a 'hunk of metal at bottom of the ocean' if Russia invades Ukraine

Pres. Biden: "If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." Reporter: "But how will you do that, exactly, since...the project is in Germany's control?" Biden: "I promise you, we will be able to do that."

U.S. Blew Up Russian Gas Pipelines Nord Stream 1 & 2, Says Former Polish Defense Minister

Victoria Nuland: “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-09-30 20:13:10.0
STATEMENT An expeditionary detachment of US Navy ships led by the universal amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge days ago was in the Baltic Sea

An expeditionary detachment of US Navy ships led by the universal amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge days ago was in the Baltic Sea It was 30 km from the site of the alleged sabotage on the Nord Stream-1 gas pipeline and 50 km from the threads of Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline

An expeditionary detachment of US Navy ships led by the universal amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge days ago was in the Baltic Sea. It was 30 km from the site of the alleged sabotage on the Nord Stream-1 gas pipeline and 50 km from the threads of Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline.

On September 2, interesting maneuvers performed by an American helicopter with the call sign FFAB123. Then it was assumed that this board was from the USS Kearsarge air wing, and today more details were looked. According to the website http://ads-b.nl , this call sign was used by 6 boards that day, of which we managed to establish the side numbers of three. All of them are Sikorsky MH-60S.

By superimposing the FFAB123 route on the scheme of yesterday’s accident, we get a rather interesting result — the helicopter either flew along the Nord Stream-2 highway, or even between the points where the accident occurred.

And finally, we need to pay attention to the June article in Sea Power, where the Americans brag about experiments in the field of underwater drones, which they put on exercises BALTOPS 22 — just in the area of the island of Bronholm. And YES,there was US military training there

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-09-30 20:01:09.0
STATEMENT There is extensive proof implicating them

There is extensive proof implicating them

Including tapes of Nuland,  and Biden  specifically promising to take it out, Condi Rice way back under Obama talking the same thing.

 US helicopters and craft were in maneuvers just before the explosions in a tight pattern around where they occurred. US  sources have boasted of the ability of undersea drones.

 

 

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-09-30 19:24:25.0
TEST Likelihood of seeing it blow up right now in three places

I've never heard of a pipeline blowing up by itself before, let alone in such a spectacular fashion involving three separate explosions,  so the odds on it happening in any given month have to be less than 1/1,000

 odds we observe it happen right now given that the US did it,  around 1.0

 odd that we observe it happen right now for  random reasons, <0.01

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-09-30 19:16:24.0
STATEMENT The pipeline could have blown on its own

The pipeline could have blown on its own

 1.0 Eric Details 2022-09-30 19:06:33.0

Copyright 2016 by TruthSift